Accessibility
Remove barriers on your website
I identify barriers to using your website and fix the agreed issues. The affected interactions are then tested again.
Review your website’s user journeys
Can someone complete your form using a keyboard? Are errors explained clearly? We test journeys like these alongside page structure and presentation. The agreed review standard determines which requirements and pages are covered.
- Pricing
- From €1,900 net
- Timing
- Timing depends on page scope, relevant journeys and the barriers found. Assessment and remediation are clearly scoped.
The assessment covers the agreed scope. It is not legal advice or a blanket certification of the entire website.
Check the important user journeys
The review includes the complete inquiry journey. We examine whether people can understand the steps and use them with a keyboard.
Illustrative test case
Correct an invalid form entry
This example shows a single test case. The pages and assessment criteria are agreed before commissioning.
Example details
- Barrier
- The invalid entry is difficult to find after submitting
- Correction
- Clearly identify the field and explain the next step
- Retest
- Check the correction within the agreed user journey
Examine the important user journeys
We select central tasks such as choosing a service and sending an inquiry. Within the agreed scope, I check keyboard operation and focus behaviour, among other requirements. Field labels and error messages are considered in the context of the task.
Connect findings with corrections and retesting
The report describes the barrier and the journey affected. This helps prioritise fixes. After the agreed corrections, the affected steps are tested again and remaining limitations are recorded.
Assess legal applicability separately
The technical review identifies specific barriers within the agreed scope. Whether your service is subject to particular legal duties is a separate question for legal review where needed. A blanket certification of the entire website is not promised.
Discuss the review scopeReview and corrections
- Findings identifying affected pages, user journeys and specific barriers
- Prioritised corrections and retesting within the agreed scope
- Documentation of the results and an accessibility statement based on the findings
Delivery and handover
Define the scope
We agree the pages, core user tasks and assessment criteria in advance.
Test the site
Keyboard use, structure, contrast, forms and core journeys are tested.
Remove barriers
I address the agreed barriers and retest the affected journeys. The results and remaining limitations are documented.
Before commissioning
Does this fit my business?
Your digital service may be covered by accessibility law
Users report concrete access problems
You need assessment and implementation from one partner
What do I need to provide?
I need website access and an overview of your users’ main tasks. Reported access problems inform the review.
Is an automated test sufficient?
Automated tools can identify certain technical issues. Whether a journey is understandable and usable with a keyboard requires additional manual checking. The approach and assessment criteria are agreed beforehand.
Do you also fix the barriers found?
Yes, where implementation is part of the agreed project. We record which corrections I undertake and which need an existing developer or external provider. The agreed changes are tested again.
What about external booking tools or embedded content?
These are considered when defining the scope. Where another provider controls the technology, we document the limitation and clarify responsibility. Changes to an external service cannot be promised in advance.
Which user journey needs to be checked?
Share the website and explain what people should be able to do there. Known problems or existing reports help define the scope.